#falseClaims

The Trump administration’s false claims and shifting rhetoric about the killing of Alex Pretti – CNN Politics

US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino with Federal agents outside a convenience store on Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2026, in Minneapolis. Angelina Katsanis / AP.

Politics 5 min read

The Trump administration’s false claims and shifting rhetoric about the killing of Alex Pretti

By Daniel Dale, Updated 47 min ago

A photograph of the pistol recovered by federal agents after a shooting in Minneapolis, Minnesota is shown on a screen behind Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem during a news conference on January 24, 2026. Al Drago / Getty Images

Top officials in President Donald Trump’s administration have responded to the killing of Alex Pretti by the Border Patrol in Minneapolis on Saturday with a torrent of claims that are either contradicted by video footage or unsupported by any evidence presented so far.

  • Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem claimed Pretti “attacked” officers, an assertion echoed by FBI Director Kash Patel, but no footage available as of Sunday afternoon shows Pretti committing any attack.
  • Noem claimed Pretti was “brandishing” a gun, but no available footage shows Pretti even holding a weapon in his hand at the scene; a concealed gun appeared to be taken from his waistband area by a federal agent moments before he was shot.
  • White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller referred to Pretti as “an assassin” who “tried to murder federal agents,” Vice President JD Vance reposted this claim, and Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino (and the Department of Homeland Security in a social media post) said it “looks like” Pretti “wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.” But nobody has shown any evidence that Pretti sought to kill anyone, let alone perpetrate a massacre.
  • Patel suggested that Pretti broke the law by carrying a concealed gun at a protest, but the Minneapolis police chief said Pretti had a permit to carry the gun and was allowed to have it on him as he was protesting in a public place.

Pretti’s parents issued a statement on Saturday saying, “The sickening lies told about our son by the administration are reprehensible and disgusting.” And in television interviews on Sunday, the administration declined to repeat some of its most incendiary allegations from Saturday about Pretti, who was a registered nurse in an intensive care unit at a Veterans Affairs facility.

Here is a look at how the Trump team’s shifting rhetoric squares with what is known about Pretti and the circumstances around his death.

The administration claimed that Pretti ‘attacked’ officers. But videos don’t show Pretti committing any attack

Noem told reporters Saturday: “This individual impeded the law enforcement officers and attacked them,” repeating the phrase “attacked them” moments later for emphasis. When Patel was asked about the shooting in a Sunday interview on Fox News, he responded, “You do not get to attack law enforcement officials in this country without any repercussions.”

No video of the incident available as of Sunday afternoon showed Pretti attacking officers.

Various footage shows him directing traffic at the site of an immigration enforcement operation, yelling at a federal agent who was interacting with other bystanders to “not push them into the traffic,” holding up a cell phone appearing to record agents, and stepping in front of an agent to intervene as the agent shoved a woman to the ground; Pretti appeared to make momentary contact with the agent with his right arm and left hand.

The agent then sprayed him with a chemical irritant and dragged him to the ground; other officers joined in the confrontation as Pretti appeared to resist, and one agent appeared to strike him repeatedly as he was on the ground.

In a Sunday interview with CNN’s Dana Bash, Bovino claimed Pretti “assaulted federal officers.” But when Bash pressed Bovino to explain what moment in the video showed Pretti committing such an assault, Bovino would not provide any specifics.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: The Trump administration’s false claims and shifting rhetoric about the killing of Alex Pretti | CNN Politics

#AlexJeffreyPretti #CNN #CNNPolitics #DepartmentOfJustice #DHS #DOJ #FalseClaims #GregoryBovino #Killing #KristiNoem #Minneapolis #ShiftingRhetoric #Trump #TrumpAdministration #USDepartmentOfHomelandSecurity
Immigration Enforcement Minnesota

The political danger of the Epstein files for Trump – CNN Politics

Ghislaine Maxwell

The political danger of the Epstein files for Trump

Politics• 4 min read

Analysis by Aaron Blake, 10 hr ago

Jeffrey Epstein andDonald Trump pose for a photograph at the Mar-a-Lago estate, Palm Beach, Florida on February 22, 1997. Davidoff Studios Photography / Getty Images.

If President Donald Trump has nothing to hide vis-à-vis Jeffrey Epstein, he sure has a weird way of showing it.

Trump hasn’t been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with the convicted sex offender, but he’s doing a great job of looking suspicious.

And that could be a political problem in and of itself – regardless of whatever ultimately comes from the Epstein files.

A batch of newly released Epstein emails on Wednesday added details about Trump’s past relationship with Epstein but no smoking guns. (The White House said the emails “prove absolutely nothing.”)

In one of those emails from 2011, Epstein expressed surprise to accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell that Trump’s name hadn’t surfaced amid accusations involving Epstein. Epstein added that Trump had at one point spent hours with Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre at Epstein’s house.

Related article Takeaways from the new Epstein emails mentioning Trump

And in 2019, Epstein appeared to signal Trump was quite aware of Maxwell recruiting girls from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in the early 2000s, saying “of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”

While some have claimed these emails show Trump had knowledge of or even involvement in Epstein’s crimes, it’s not nearly so evident. Giuffre, who died by suicide in April, has acknowledged meeting Trump and never accused him of wrongdoing. And Trump has acknowledged being aware of Maxwell recruiting employees including Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago. (The big question there is whether Trump had any inkling about what Maxwell was recruiting a minor female like Giuffre for.)

But also notable on Wednesday was Trump’s reaction.

As all this was going down, he and his White House seemed preoccupied with what appeared to an 11th-hour campaign to thwart a House discharge petition that would force a vote on releasing the full Epstein files.

With the petition due to get a decisive 218th signature when a new Democratic member of Congress was sworn in later that day, the White House held a meeting in the Situation Room with a key GOP lawmaker who’d signed on, while another said she was playing phone tag with the president. Both GOP congresswomen later told CNN Trump hadn’t personally lobbied them to remove their names. But the president also publicly pressured Republicans who sided with Democrats on forcing Epstein disclosures.

It was a weird move, to be sure. No Republicans removed their names from the petition, and Speaker Mike Johnson quickly said he would schedule a vote for next week on compelling the Justice Department to release the full files.

Related article Trump is getting pulled deeper and deeper into the Epstein drama

Even if the measure passes in the House, that’s not the end of the story. The GOP-led Senate would still have to take it up, and Trump would still have to sign it. So it’s not like this will cause the imminent release of the documents.

But Trump’s resistance to something his base has long clamored for – and the optics of the Situation Room meeting in particular – would only seem to deepen the huge suspicions that a large number of Americans already harbor about the government covering up Epstein-related matters.

And that gets at the big point here – and the political danger for Trump.

This is merely the latest baffling episode in the administration’s handling of the Epstein files. Among the others:

Even if Trump doesn’t have anything to hide, the danger here is in making it look a whole lot like he does.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: The political danger of the Epstein files for Trump | CNN Politics

#2025 #america #cnn #cnnPolitics #denials #donaldTrump #education #epstein #epsteinFiles #falseClaims #ghislaineMaxwell #health #history #jeffreyEpstein #libraries #library #libraryOfCongress #maxwellInterview #opinion #politics #prison #resistance #science #trump #trumpAdministration #unitedStates

2025-11-01

Elon Musk said: "I think I’m a centrist."

After you stop laughing, this question remains:
Who does Musk think is politically to the right of him?

StacesCases2 🇨🇦 📎stacescases2.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
2025-10-16

Economists at #GoldmanSachs released an analysis this week estimating that US consumers are shouldering up to 55% of the costs stemming from #Trump’sTariffs, even though the president has made #falseclaims that the tariffs on imports EXCLUSIVELY "tax foreigners". www.commondreams.org/news/trump-t...

US Consumers Paying the Most f...

2025-07-01

The testimonies reveal that Hamas seeks to disrupt the distribution of food packages at the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid distribution sites.
jpost.com/middle-east/article-
#Gaza #IDF #falseclaims #GHF #Hamas #Israel

Saksham Agrawalsakshamagrawal
2025-06-30

New ITR rules impose a 200% fine on False Tax Deduction claims.

STOPDISINFORMATIONStopDisinformation
2025-06-24

turning crisis into catastrophe, report says | |
Climate misinformation turning crisis into catastrophe, report says
obstructing climate action, say researchers, amid calls for climate lies to be criminalised

Damian Carrington Environment editor

Rampant is turning the crisis into a catastrophe, according to the authors of a new report.

The Guardian
theguardian.com/environment/20

Claire 🌊🇪🇺🇫🇷🌍clbear31@mstdn.party
2025-05-29

4/ Even when the report did correctly cite authors, it misrepresented their findings. For example, Mariana G. Figueiro's study about screen time and sleep in children was twisted to suggest something completely different. 😤
#ScienceMisrepresentation #ScreenTime #SleepHealth #FalseClaims

2025-01-03

Sorry, I am not a lawyer, but why can the UK not sue this moron ? He is a private person making false statements on a "political scale"...or should we blame the "media" for reposting this nonsense?

bbc.com/news/articles/czxdzng9

Name and Shamenameandshame
2024-12-17

🚨Booming Bookkeeping Business: Censorship and Deceptive Practices🚨

Booming Bookkeeping Business has faced accusations of manipulating reviews and hiding negative feedback by improperly using copyright takedown notices. The program, marketed by Bill Von Fumetti, has also been criticized for overselling the ease of starting a successful bookkeeping business.

🔗 Read the full report here: nameandshame.com/investigation

Name and Shamenameandshame
2024-12-12

🚨 Saleh Momla's :Attempt to Hide Dark Past Exposed🚨

Saleh Momla, a Toronto teacher with criminal allegations, tried erasing his past by using fake DMCA notices to remove negative content from Google. This case highlights misuse of the DMCA takedown process and raises concerns about reputation laundering and cybercrime.

🔗 Read the full investigation: nameandshame.com/investigation

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst