#evolutionOfCooperation

la biologie comme support théorique du socialisme youtube.com/watch?v=8LaIsAlssaU (il faut coopérer pour survivre: les rapports de compétition et de prédation ne sont pas les plus déterminants dans les écosystèmes)

#biology #socialism #coop #EvolutionOfCooperation

Nadiah Kristensennadiah@fediscience.org
2025-12-20

My #introduction keywords: #academic #modelling #evolution #cooperation #gameTheory #ecology #appliedMathematics

I'm a #postdoc specialising in evolutionary and ecological modelling, currently at #QUT and #GriffithUni in #Australia

Previous work: #evolutionOfCooperation, estimating undetected #extinctions, #qualitativemodelling, migratory #phenology, #foodweb #modelling, local #adaptation, #carryover effects, #dispersal.

My blog: nadiah.org/

Nadiah Kristensennadiah@fediscience.org
2025-11-25

Why is altruism more common in nature than spite? This new paper gives a general mathematical explanation: the degree of negative assortment that can be achieved is constrained in a way that positive assortment is not, particularly in unbalanced populations.

sciencedirect.com/science/arti

#cooperation #spite #evolution #evolutionOfCooperation

Multi panel figure illustrating the following intuition for why group structures favoring altruism might be more common than those favoring spite. It considers the example scenarios with pairs of individuals. When the population is evenly split between 100 actors (altruistic or spiteful) and 100 non-actors, maximum positive assortment produces all same-type pairs (50 pairs actor+actor, 50 pairs actor+nonactor) and maximum negative assortment produces all opposite-type pairs (100 pairs actor+nonactor). Therefore, maximum assortativity produces equally group structures most favorable to altruism and group structures most favorable to spite. However, when actors outnumber non-actors (140 actors, 60 nonactors), positive and negative assortment have asymmetric effects on group structure. Maximum positive assortment still produces all same-type pairs (70 pairs actor+actor, 30 pairs actor+nonactor); however, maximum negative assortment cannot achieve all opposite-type pairs due to the surplus of actors – some same-type pairs (actor–actor) must remain (60 pairs actor+nonactor, 40 pairs actor+actor, ). Therefore, the maximum achievable positive assortment promotes altruism more effectively than the maximum negative assortment promotes spite. A similar asymmetry arises when non-actors outnumber actors.
Nadiah Kristensennadiah@fediscience.org
2025-11-19

Analytic solution for the stationary distribution of actions taken in iterated games with implementation errors, and code to automate the solution in SymPy.

nadiah.org/2025/11/18/analytic

#python #cooperation #evolutionOfCooperation #gametheory

Nadiah Kristensennadiah@fediscience.org
2024-11-22

I recently read a paper by Kleshnina and others and used it to teach myself some evolutionary game theory techniques.

This is a little obscure, so I'll thread below about why this topic matters for humans and the environment 🧵

nadiah.org/2024/11/20/kleshnin

#GameTheory #PrisonersDilemma #iteratedGame #cooperation #EvolutionOfCooperation #Z3 #pyeda #networkx #sympy #SageMath #sustainability

Nadiah Kristensennadiah@fediscience.org
2024-11-05

Martin & Lessard (2024) find that assortment generally increases the fixation probability of Cooperation (C), but not if payoffs are multiplicative such that a Defector receives a much larger payoff than C in groups containing a very large number of C individuals.

sciencedirect.com/science/arti

#gametheory #EvolutionOfCooperation #SocialDilemma

Chairman Meow ᓚᘏᗢ 🐿️🍉darcher@hachyderm.io
2024-04-27

I'm gonna have to read it more carefully but at first glance this looks like it might be an #EvolutionOfCooperation ground-breaker.

It's worth mentioning that the first thing that occurred to me when I saw this is that money serves this same same social purpose of creating "artificially amplified" incentives for cooperation within a population, but modeling a shared currency as a special case of institutions is actually a better, more generic way to look at it!

osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/uftz

Radical AnthropologyRadicalAnthro@c.im
2024-03-06

FREE community #fediscience, please boost!

TONIGHT!!
Everybody is welcome!
Tuesday March 12 6:30pm London time
we have #ShaktiLamba

'Building Well Together'

This is a study of #mutualaid and the #commons in an #Indian Forest-living community with #biologist, #anthropologist and #ecologist Shakti Lamba.

FREE, LIVE @UCLAnthropology and on ZOOM (details below 👇)

radicalanthropologygroup.org

Shakti will be speaking in the Daryll Forde Seminar Room, 2nd Floor of the Anthro building. Please use main entrance of the Archaeology Institute in Gordon Square and someone will help direct you across to the Anthro building.

Before her talk, we have a video exhibition documenting the well-building community project, from 5:45 to 6:30pm in Room 129, 1st Floor of UCL Anthro building (underneath Daryll Forde).

#huntergatherers #India #evolutionofcooperation #anthropology

Open air community meeting in Pahari Korwa village with women and kids squatting down in the foreground, men gathered on the further side on mats. All seem very focused on discussion.
Chairman Meow ᓚᘏᗢ 🐿️🍉darcher@hachyderm.io
2023-12-01

I'm not a fan of Dominic Johnson's Supernatural Punishment Hypothesis. Not actively hostile to it or anything, but it seems kind of just-so as anthropology, and it's even less plausible as a driver of genetic selection.

Anyway TIL that an IPD agent model they did in 2016 to demonstrate it didn't even show the expected selection strength "in silico" and I have to admit I found that funny. 😀 #EvolutionOfCooperation

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst