Keeping in mind that we're trying to prove as many of these claims as we possibly can before my fingers fall off, here's a very short Raw Story article that FBI Director Kash Patel lied to cover up the Department of Justice's Epstein cover up (I told you this stuff was Russian nesting dolls of fuckery) under oath a few months ago.
https://www.rawstory.com/kash-patel-2675065877/
Allegations fly as FBI head's past comments haunt him: 'Kash is part of a massive coverup'
"After the DOJ released millions more Epstein files ahead of the weekend, political analysts and observers began circulating an earlier Patel quote that they see as contradictory to the facts.
Under oath, Patel said, "There’s no credible information that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked minors."
But ex-Obama staffer Tommy Vietor claims that statement means Patel must be in on a cover-up.
"It is impossible to square the information in the latest Epstein files release with these comments by Kash Patel," Vietor wrote. "Kash is part of a massive coverup."
Quite frankly this is cowardly, and even somewhat incompetent reporting by Raw Story. The fact that Kash Patel perjured himself under oath before Congress isn't just "a thing some people are saying" - there's a video included in the article of Patel doing exactly that during his testimony. He said there is no evidence Epstein trafficked minors, and in the very files the DoJ released we have reams of witness testimony from Epstein victims that he did in fact, traffic minors. Testimony is evidence, that's literally how the law works. Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche lie just to breathe on TV about the Epstein case, but Patel was the guy they sent out there to do it under oath; because he's an neophyte dipshit who has no idea that now makes him legally liable. There's also an embarrassing typo in the story, when the author says Kash made this statement in 2015, rather than 2025 (a few months ago) like he actually did.
Which brings up another obvious question - if any random person with a search bar and a minute to watch Patel talk, can prove the Director of the FBI lied under oath, and the only purpose for that would be to protect Epstein associates and literal co-conspirators in his pedophile human trafficking operation, why isn't that front page news?
And that my friends, is what I mean about the tone of our society's response, lead by our ruling classes and the influencers they control, not matching the severity of literally anything about the Epstein case. The FBI director lying his ass off under oath would be news even if it were about parking tickets, but since it's about protecting rich people who have either done sexual assault crimes (including against minors) or happily conspire with such, it's absolutely mind blowing that more people in our media don't care about this. In fact, it's a little suspicious.
More importantly, all of this is just another brick in the wall of evidence demonstrating that Trump, his Justice Department, and indeed his entire administration is engaging in a criminal conspiracy to cover up actual crimes revealed in the Epstein files. In addition to all the shady influence pedaling and reputation washing going on in there.
#Epstein #Trump #FBI #Congress #DepartmentOfJustice #EpsteinFiles #KashPatel #CoverUp
