@PetraPhoenix You're kind of missing the point, but at the same time, demonstrating it.
The "standard" way of getting skills is going to a school, getting then, and then having them for life. Neurotypicals have only relatively recently adopted the slogans of "life-long learning" and such, and many still don't quite grasp the idea. It doesn't fit the idea of people being defined by "professions".
#ADHD people often have trouble with the "standard" way, but can pick skills up in ways that defy NT people. Do this often enough, and you'll be life-long learning new things.
The ability that comes from this tendency is valuable as a meta-skill. It means that you're not restricted by your "profession". (Asimov has an interesting short story about this sort of thing, btw, from long before the proper scientific research into ADHD. But I digress.) But because this goes against the "standard" way, "normalcy"-oriented people might easily disregard it — and insomuch ADHD people take cues about "normalcy" from the NT people, this disregard can be infectious.
Importantly, though, even NT people expect the executive class people to be universalists. Oftentimes, the expectation doesn't hold, which can, curiously, lead to an experience that superficially seems to uphold the expectation: repeatedly failing from an executive position to an executive position, or even upwards. "Normal people" can interpret this sort of career track radically differently in context of working-class people and executive-class people (or Nomenklatura-class people, in USSR-like systems).
@restorante